Thursday, March 3, 2011

Kennedy's Inaugural Speech

I really, really, really like this.  And I really like Ted Sorenson z"l who was involved in its writing.



Vice President Johnson, Mr. Speaker, Mr. Chief Justice, President Eisenhower, Vice President Nixon, President Truman, reverend clergy, fellow citizens:

We observe today not a victory of party, but a celebration of freedom -- symbolizing an end, as well as a beginning -- signifying renewal, as well as change. For I have sworn before you and Almighty God the same solemn oath our forebears prescribed nearly a century and three-quarters ago.
The world is very different now. For man holds in his mortal hands the power to abolish all forms of human poverty and all forms of human life. And yet the same revolutionary beliefs for which our forebears fought are still at issue around the globe -- the belief that the rights of man come not from the generosity of the state, but from the hand of God.
We dare not forget today that we are the heirs of that first revolution. Let the word go forth from this time and place, to friend and foe alike, that the torch has been passed to a new generation of Americans -- born in this century, tempered by war, disciplined by a hard and bitter peace, proud of our ancient heritage, and unwilling to witness or permit the slow undoing of those human rights to which this nation has always been committed, and to which we are committed today at home and around the world.

Let every nation know, whether it wishes us well or ill, that we shall pay any price, bear any burden, meet any hardship, support any friend, oppose any foe, to assure the survival and the success of liberty.
This much we pledge -- and more.

To those old allies whose cultural and spiritual origins we share, we pledge the loyalty of faithful friends. United there is little we cannot do in a host of cooperative ventures. Divided there is little we can do -- for we dare not meet a powerful challenge at odds and split asunder.
To those new states whom we welcome to the ranks of the free, we pledge our word that one form of colonial control shall not have passed away merely to be replaced by a far more iron tyranny. We shall not always expect to find them supporting our view. But we shall always hope to find them strongly supporting their own freedom -- and to remember that, in the past, those who foolishly sought power by riding the back of the tiger ended up inside.
To those people in the huts and villages of half the globe struggling to break the bonds of mass misery, we pledge our best efforts to help them help themselves, for whatever period is required -- not because the Communists may be doing it, not because we seek their votes, but because it is right. If a free society cannot help the many who are poor, it cannot save the few who are rich.
To our sister republics south of our border, we offer a special pledge: to convert our good words into good deeds, in a new alliance for progress, to assist free men and free governments in casting off the chains of poverty. But this peaceful revolution of hope cannot become the prey of hostile powers. Let all our neighbors know that we shall join with them to oppose aggression or subversion anywhere in the Americas. And let every other power know that this hemisphere intends to remain the master of its own house.
To that world assembly of sovereign states, the United Nations, our last best hope in an age where the instruments of war have far outpaced the instruments of peace, we renew our pledge of support -- to prevent it from becoming merely a forum for invective, to strengthen its shield of the new and the weak, and to enlarge the area in which its writ may run.

Finally, to those nations who would make themselves our adversary, we offer not a pledge but a request: that both sides begin anew the quest for peace, before the dark powers of destruction unleashed by science engulf all humanity in planned or accidental self-destruction.

We dare not tempt them with weakness. For only when our arms are sufficient beyond doubt can we be certain beyond doubt that they will never be employed.
But neither can two great and powerful groups of nations take comfort from our present course -- both sides overburdened by the cost of modern weapons, both rightly alarmed by the steady spread of the deadly atom, yet both racing to alter that uncertain balance of terror that stays the hand of mankind's final war.

So let us begin anew -- remembering on both sides that civility is not a sign of weakness, and sincerity is always subject to proof. Let us never negotiate out of fear, but let us never fear to negotiate.
Let both sides explore what problems unite us instead of belaboring those problems which divide us.

Let both sides, for the first time, formulate serious and precise proposals for the inspection and control of arms, and bring the absolute power to destroy other nations under the absolute control of all nations.

Let both sides seek to invoke the wonders of science instead of its terrors. Together let us explore the stars, conquer the deserts, eradicate disease, tap the ocean depths, and encourage the arts and commerce.

Let both sides unite to heed, in all corners of the earth, the command of Isaiah -- to "undo the heavy burdens, and [to] let the oppressed go free."¹

And, if a beachhead of cooperation may push back the jungle of suspicion, let both sides join in creating a new endeavor -- not a new balance of power, but a new world of law -- where the strong are just, and the weak secure, and the peace preserved.

All this will not be finished in the first one hundred days. Nor will it be finished in the first one thousand days; nor in the life of this Administration; nor even perhaps in our lifetime on this planet. But let us begin.

In your hands, my fellow citizens, more than mine, will rest the final success or failure of our course. Since this country was founded, each generation of Americans has been summoned to give testimony to its national loyalty. The graves of young Americans who answered the call to service surround the globe.

Now the trumpet summons us again -- not as a call to bear arms, though arms we need -- not as a call to battle, though embattled we are -- but a call to bear the burden of a long twilight struggle, year in and year out, "rejoicing in hope; patient in tribulation,"² a struggle against the common enemies of man: tyranny, poverty, disease, and war itself.
Can we forge against these enemies a grand and global alliance, North and South, East and West, that can assure a more fruitful life for all mankind? Will you join in that historic effort?
In the long history of the world, only a few generations have been granted the role of defending freedom in its hour of maximum danger. I do not shrink from this responsibility -- I welcome it. I do not believe that any of us would exchange places with any other people or any other generation. The energy, the faith, the devotion which we bring to this endeavor will light our country and all who serve it. And the glow from that fire can truly light the world.

And so, my fellow Americans, ask not what your country can do for you; ask what you can do for your country.

My fellow citizens of the world, ask not what America will do for you, but what together we can do for the freedom of man.
Finally, whether you are citizens of America or citizens of the world, ask of us here the same high standards of strength and sacrifice which we ask of you. With a good conscience our only sure reward, with history the final judge of our deeds, let us go forth to lead the land we love, asking His blessing and His help, but knowing that here on earth God's work must truly be our own.

Wednesday, March 2, 2011

Ontology

Learned a new word today Ontology and Ontological. I'm still a little fuzzy as to how it's used exactly but it seems to be a word that I could have sorely used throughout the writing of my blog instead of always using the word Existential (although admittedly Ontology seems more like a disease than a description of Being and Existence).

Don't I feel stupid. Live and Learn. :-)

I always stayed away from study of the Philosophy field because I had read that some claim  it a waste of time but maybe I should look into it more since I seem to gravitate to the issues of Being so much these days...

Tuesday, February 8, 2011

Deviated Words in Modern Hebrew - imo

Will add to the list as I go of translation/modern usages I think are distorted from the Torah:

1. הונאה is not fraud or deception
2. להתעמר is not to bully
3. להתעקש is not to be stubborn
4. להשמין , the הפעיל form means to make something else fat, not to become fat oneself
5. מחזה is not appropriate a word for 'a play'
6. ממזר is not a bastard/ born-out-of-wedlock
7. אירוסין is not "getting engaged"
8. מבוכה as 'embarassment'??... I think בושה is the only word possible. what is the use of מבוך in the torah come to think of it....?
9. דכאון not being depression
10. מוביל while having the meaning of bringing/movement does not mean leader/leading
11. אבד הלכתי לאיבודI don't think you find an instance of this used in reference to a human being where the meaning is not ontological or existential. In other words it can't be used for saying a person "got lost" unless they're literally no longer or disconnected from reality to the point that it's as if they're אבוד. you can't use it to refer to taking a wrong turn on a highway exit.
12. לבכר as a generalized use of "to favor/prefer". I have my misgivings of this usage despite it's usage in the לא יוכל לבכר את בן האהובה
13. תמורה does not mean transformation
14. בתול I don't think the Torah recognizes the concept applying to a man
15. מגושם does not mean 'clumsy'

Thursday, February 3, 2011

Nice Russian Song and Some Thoughts On Russian Ethos

I think I've realized today from the following song one of the core components of Russian culture that I find so beautiful and endearing. There's this sense of integrity towards the the greater good, honor, while accepting one's individual hardships and suffering. It's more than just the short vs long term investment of a  ויאהב יעקב ברחל וכו ויהיו בעיניו כימים אחדים באהבתו אותה . It's a sacrifice of oneself entirely, absolutely for the integrity and honor of something greater than oneself.

Consider the below song along with these other classical russian culture works:  "Moscow does not believe in Tears" (film) , One Million Roses - Alla Pugachova (song), Ya Vas Lyubil and many others...

Anyway, this song and lyrics I'm taking straight from YouTube... it seems to be called Alice & Carroll.. translation thereafter also straight from YouTube...

Так вот, теперь сиди и слушай -
Он не желал ей зла,
Он не хотел запасть ей в душу
И тем лишить ее сна.
Он приносил по выходным ей сладости,
Читал в ее ладонях линии,
И он не знал на свете большей радости,
Чем называть ее по имени.

Ей было где-то тридцать шесть,
Когда он очень тихо помер,
Ей даже не пришлось успеть
В последний раз набрать его несложный номер.
Но в первый раз несла она ему цветы:
Две ярко-белых лилии
В знак, что более никто, кроме него,
Так не называл ее по имени.

И было ей семьдесят шесть,
Когда ее самой не стало.
Нет, не страшила ее смерть,
Скорей, она о ней мечтала.
Бывало, знаете ли, сядет у окна
И смотрит, смотрит, смотрит в небо синее -
Дескать, когда умру, я встречу его там,
и вновь тогда он назовет меня по имени.

Какая, в сущности, смешная вышла жизнь,
Хотя... что может быть красивее,
Чем сидеть на облаке и, свесив ножки вниз,
Друг друга называть по имени?



Translation:
Ok, now sit down and listen to my story.
He never bore ill will to her.
He never wanted to be engraved upon her heart,
to deprive her of innocent sleep.
At weekends he brought her sweets,
he contemplated the lines in her palm.
He never knew a greater joy
than to address her by her first name.

She was about 36
when he peacefully passed away.
She had not managed
to dial his simple number for the last time.
And, for the first time she was now bringing him flowers,
two bright white lilies,
to show that no one else could call her by her first name
the way he did.

She was about 76
when she passed away.
She had not been afraid of death
she had been dreaming about it.
Imagine, she would sit by the window
watching watching watching the blue sky intently.
Thinking: when I die I will meet him there,
and he will call me by my first name.

How funny the life turned out to be.
Still... what could be more beautiful
than to be sitting on a cloud, your legs hanging in the air,
calling each other by your first names.

Sunday, January 30, 2011

Speech as Dissipitant/Outlet of Sexual Desire

Have a theory/hypothesis that speech and talking per se acts as a dissipitant/outlet of sexual urge and desire but didn't find any concrete material on the subject... to be continued then...

ועי' זוהר נשא קכא ב' "וצריך לשורר ולנגן וכו'" --וצע"ע

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Tell Me Lies, Tell Me Sweet Lies

A joke from a friend of mine:

A low-class guy (israeli slang for it is ars) invites the Rabbi to come to his home and check his mezuzuot. After checking the whole house the Rabbi says "All the mezuzot are fine except for one that I found pasul. Shall I fix it for you?" The ars responds with astonishment and says "...fix this mezuza, are you crazy?! I swear by this mezuza everyday to my wife that I don't cheat on her!!"

Funny joke but upon reflection the insight in it is powerful:  When it comes down to it, everyone wants atleast one מזוזה פסולה in the house to swear and live their lives by. No one wants to (or arguably can) live their lives against a standard of absolute honest Truth, a מזוזה כשרה. A world which would be entirely expressive of Truth would be a disaster for the generation undergoing the transition... just look at the backlash that came from the Wikileaks-US Cables debacle.

Imagine what it would mean to live in a world where people are brutally honest in their relationships, be they political, commercial, romantic, or any other... Our society's social structure is simply not built to handle it... 

And so we pray everyday for a world that will be expressive of existential true reality while knowing that if it doesn't develop and sprout forth gradually the sudden abruptness of the correction could destroy everything entirely - מצמיח קרן ישועה

So in the meantime we live with the one pasul mezuza in our personal, communal, and global lives. "Tell me lies, tell me sweet little lies" (or big ones, as the case may be).

מלאכי ג' יט כי-הנה היום בא, בער כתנור; והיו כל-זדים וכל-עשה רשעה, קש, ולהט אתם היום הבא אמר יהוה צבאות, אשר לא-יעזב להם שרש וענף.כ וזרחה לכם יראי שמי, שמש צדקה, ומרפא, בכנפיה; ויצאתם ופשתם, כעגלי מרבק. כא ועסותם רשעים--כי-יהיו אפר, תחת כפות רגליכם:  ביום אשר אני עשה, אמר יהוה צבאות.

See further  "In My Secret Life"

Saturday, January 1, 2011

תשובה Existentially

The concepts of תשובה and אין מספיקין בידו לעשות תשובה--

תשובה being an accessing and changing of one's existential self and who he is, not what he does per se.... the ability and opportunity of accessing a depth of existential self-layer so that it's even possible to express regret, shame, etc regarding one's own particular evils in a meaningful lasting manner... hence, אין מספיקין בידו meaning the general sense of jadedness-apathy-lethargy-etc that we feel all too often in today's world, that doesn't allow us to even access that part of ourselves, that particular self-layer, where the potential lies for true-fundamental-existential expression and change...

"well you can't fight the tears that 'aint comin ...when everything feels like the movies, yeah you bleed just to know you're alive..." (Goo Goo Dolls)

I thought it's beautifully seen in the pasuk וימנע מרשעים אורם-- איוב לח
אור לא נאמר אלא אורם  \i.e. the light and infinity that is within them themselves, at deeper levels....

See also here Layers of Self